Showing posts with label plant identification. Show all posts
Showing posts with label plant identification. Show all posts

Sunday, August 28, 2022

We Saw This Really Blue Flower...


Day 319: Rangers at the desk of the Visitor Center are frequently asked to identify a plant, bird or animal from the briefest of descriptions. It happens less often when we're out in the backcountry, although it is still a fairly common occurrence. A perfect example would be, "We saw this really blue flower near Tipsoo Lake. What was it?" The query may be accompanied by a postage-stamp sized out-of-focus photo from which it is likely impossible to tell whether the plant in question was Monskhood (Aconitum, left) or Larkspur (Delphinium, right). When asked to give a clearer description of the blossom, the visitor falters and then says, "I think there was some white in the middle." How about the foliage? That's asking too much. It had leaves, and they were green.

While botanists get seriously up close and personal with their plants, counting stamens, examining leaves for fine hairs and so on, we ask nothing more of you than that you count the petals, decide whether they are all the same shape and size, and tell us whether the leaves were long or rounded, single or splayed out like fingers on a hand. These simple bits of information (or other obvious morphological characteristics) are usually enough to put us in the ballpark when coupled with season and location. Referring to the photos above, Monkshoods upper petals form the distinct hood which gives the plant its common name, while the petals of Larkspur open out like those a child might draw. That simple distinction could answer the question of "What was that really blue flower we saw at Tipsoo?" without the need for a ranger's suggestions. But then, everybody likes to talk to a ranger, right?

Monday, August 8, 2022

Adding To The Inventory


Day 299: Team Biota scores again! I'd gone one way while Joe and Sharon went another, and on my way back, shiny leaves caught my eye...shiny, like "poison-ivy" shiny, and three-lobed, but obviously not PI/PO. "Hmmmm...," said I. "I don't think I've seen that before." And then I walked right on past it as I heard Joe call out, "I've got another odd one." His turned out to be the distorted leaves of a plant we have yet to identify, the in-curling apparently the result of disease, insect infestation or some other stressor, and as we searched for other examples of it, I almost forgot about Mr. Shiny-Leaves. Once we were done looking for deformed plants, I said, "Oh, yeah...I've got another weird one in the woods a ways, just one of them." The three of us went in together for a multi-camera photo shoot, and when we got back to the car, we broke out the books. They were no help at all. We'd found another Mystery Plant.

At home, I broke out Hitchcock and stayed up well past my bedtime trying to nail it down. I got as far as Ranunculaceae, but no further. In the morning, I did the only sensible thing, and shipped the photo off to both Arnie and David. Arnie admitted to being stumped, and I didn't hear from David until Sunday night. He suggested Coptis laciniata, Oregon Goldthread. Initially, I wasn't sure, and thought it might be a different Coptis, but another session with Hitchcock settled the matter. The leaves were divided to the mid-vein, the factor which excluded my other candidate. Now we have to make a return trip to search more thoroughly for other examples of the plant. The best news? This is another new species for the Park (and I believe the county as well), and Team Biota is running victory laps.

Sunday, March 27, 2022

Should Be A No-Brainer


Day 165: Believe it or not, the majority of people I meet on the trail cannot tell these two plants apart. It should be a no-brainer. One has four petals, the other five. One has shamrock-shaped leaves, the other a small compound leaf with three parts. Yes, they both are whitish (in some cases verging on pink or lavender), the petals of both exhibit darker purple lines, and they emerge at roughly the same time in the spring and enjoy the same types of habitat. The three ladies I met on the South Swofford Trail a few days ago asked me,"What are the little pink flowers?" When I replied, "Which ones?" they could only say, "The ones we've seen growing beside the trail today." Since we were standing in an area where Cardamine substantially outnumbered specimens of Oxalis, it took a little backtracking before I could point out the differences. While some people have a natural gift for observation, it can be learned by almost anyone and honed like any other skill. It just takes practice. Counting petals is a good place to start.

Tuesday, June 23, 2020

Find Prosartes


Day 254: Now several weeks past its blooming period, the Fairybells are just one more green thing in the green, green sea of our forests. I had found Prosartes hookeri near this spot a month ago and, despite it being a common plant, photographed it and put the images in my files, little expecting to have to refer back to them at a later date. In another corner of the universe (Oregon), Arnie was working on the vascular plant list for the same area. We've been bouncing species and subspecies around for several days via email, hoping to refine the catalog. However, when it came to Prosartes, he had recorded one species during a survey he'd personally conducted, whereas my record showed another one entirely. Was one of us wrong in our identification, or were there in fact two different Fairybells at Tahoma Woods? I could recall having walked past some which I dismissed as "not fully open yet" when they were in bloom; could I have overlooked the second species, whose petals never curl back to expose the stamens? Yes, I thought I could have done, and equally, Arnie admitted that he might have given mine (which I was sure were hookeri) a perfunctory glance or missed them entirely. Thus it became my mission for the day to find a green needle in a vast green haystack. In the end, I located ten specimens in as many acres, and all of them along the trail were Prosartes smithii, i.e., the "other" Fairybells. Just to reassure myself that I hadn't made a mistake with the roadside plants I'd photographed, I also checked them on the way home. Yep, different Fairybells. The census has been amended to include both P. smithii and P. hookeri.