This is the 15th year of continuous daily publication for 365Caws. All things considered, it's likely it will be the last year as it is becoming increasingly difficult for me to find interesting material. However, I hope that I may have inspired someone to a greater curiosity about the natural world with my natural history posts, or encouraged a novice weaver or needleworker. If so, I've done what I set out to do.
Friday, July 10, 2020
Verify
Day 271: A couple of unrelated events this last week have bolstered my contention that the internet is the world's greatest source of misinformation. Several searches on various subjects have further strengthened the conviction, to the point that I now feel it is safe to assert that there is a greater abundance of wrong information than right present on our beloved web.
Let us begin this exercise by saying that one of the test tubes in the photo above is filled with pee. That's right: urine. Hie thee to Mr. Google and look up urine samples. You will find them in almost every hue and state of turbidity. Compare various images, and you may find yourself digging more deeply into pH levels, dietary influences, drug tests, medication responses and so on. Once you think you have identified the tube containing urine, ask yourself what its colour and clarity suggest. By the time you've done an hour's on-line research, you might even begin to feel qualified for a P (if perhaps not the hD) in pee. You've done well! Only one problem: I lied. I took you by the hand, led you down the garden path, and told you a whopper. This is a "hoto" of liquid-filled test tubes; there's no p in any of them.
See how easily you were gulled? Likewise, if I were to tell you that they have Greys in captivity in Area 51, or that the government can turn your micowave oven into a remote listening device, or that "male" and "female" peppers can be distinguished by the number of bumps on their bottoms, the internet is there to support those claims from multiple sources. Now, more than ever before, verification of material of any sort is essential, and should be conducted before that material is republished in any form.
I make this promise to my readers: that I will try to maintain a laboratory standard for accuracy in my posts, and if I should find myself to be in error, to publish a retraction as soon as it comes to my attention. If admitting I was wrong embarrasses me, then let me blush. A blush fades quickly and does no lasting harm, unlike the perpetuation of misinformation.
No comments:
Post a Comment