Showing posts with label Rusavskia elegans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rusavskia elegans. Show all posts

Saturday, October 19, 2019

Rusavskia Elegans At Panorama Point


Day 6: I recently decided to re-read Terry Pratchett's "Hogfather" and discovered that I'd previously gone right over a gem of botanical humour without it registering. I present it here, aptly, to accompany Rusavskia elegans, formerly known as Xanthoria elegans.

Says Ponder Stibbons of bananas, "...Botanically, its a type of fish, sir. According to my theory it's cladistically associaed with the Krullian pipefish, sir, which of course is also yellow and goes around in bunches or shoals."

Ah, yes, the logic of taxonomy! For generations, that was exactly how it worked. This plant has five petals, the ovary is superior, the leaf has such-and-so shape and is semi-succulent, the growth habit is trailing, therefore it has to be a Nasturtium. Okay, it was a little more complicated than that, but you get the idea. Many things (not only vascular plants and lichens, but animals as well) were dumped into genera based on obvious morphological features. With the advent of and growing accessibility to DNA analysis, we're discovering that even some species which look almost identical are in fact members of different genera than we thought. In-depth knowledge of their genetic structure sometimes necessitates the creation of a new genus as was the case with Rusavskia. It looks like a Xanthoria (duck), quacks like a Xanthoria (duck), swims like a Xanthoria (duck), but it is not a Xanthoria. It's still duck-like, but Rusavskia is a goose.

And there was a whole flock of Rusavskia "geese" bright against the dark rock and skies above Panorama Point's historic resroom, more than I have ever seen in one place. I couldn't get close to the main population of rosettes without climbing on the roof (prohibited), but the rock face looked as if someone had come along with a can of orange spray paint and laid on a streak six inches wide by three feet long. In just a few weeks, they'll be buried in snow, remaining hidden for the next six months or so, to survive the cruelty of the prolonged alpine winter.

Thursday, June 29, 2017

Also Known As...


Day 259: I don't feel so badly now. I wasn't quite sure of this lichen's identity, so I sent it off to Katherine Glew at the UW for confirmation. She replied with taxonomy new to me, sparking a discussion covering the logic behind renaming species. When I couldn't find any reference to "Polycauliona elegans" in any of my customary sources, I asked her if she could provide me with a link to the updated information. At that point, she said, "Oops! Correct that genus to 'Rusavskia.'"

Even among professionals like Katherine (lichens) and Arnie (vascular plants), confusion is rampant because nomenclature can change overnight. Largely, we are not privy to the molecular studies and genetic research behind the changes, so they take us by surprise. We struggle to keep up, worried that we'll embarrass ourselves by using an older synonym in conversation with colleagues, concerned that we'll be marked as resistant to change. I rail against taxonomists constantly because the changes make my work more difficult, but at the same time, I am thankful for the better understanding of the species which has necessitated reclassification. That said, I wish the taxonomists would stick to descriptive terms. "Xanthoria" tells you something memorable about this lichen, i.e., that it's orangy-yellow, xanthous. "Rusavskia" only gives us a clue to a person or place (Rusavski) related to it. To further confuse matters, not all Xanthorias were removed to the new taxon. Indeed, some were reclassified as "Polycauliona," hence the hiccup in Katherine's communication.

Will I remember "Rusavskia" the next time I find this orange lichen's beautifully symmetrical rosettes? Not likely. I will say as I did on the occasion of this discovery, "Oh, it's xanthous and it's utterly elegant. Joe, look! I've got another Xanthoria elegans over here."