365Caws is now in its 16th year of publication. If I am unable to post daily, I hope readers who love the natural world and fiberarts will seize those days to read the older material. Remember that this has been my journey as well, so you may find errors in my identifications of plants. I have tried to correct them as I discover them. Likewise, I have refined fiberarts techniques and have adjusted recipes, so search by tags to find the most current information. And thank you for following me!
Showing posts with label scientific names. Show all posts
Showing posts with label scientific names. Show all posts
Sunday, October 10, 2021
Calocera Cornea
Day 362: Calocera cornea is distinguished from its cousin Calocera furcata not only by its pointy little fruiting bodies, but by its preference for decaying hardwood over that of conifers. Let's look at the Latin for a second, because in this case, it's descriptive of the growth forms of the two different fungi. "Cornus/cornea" means "horn." The same root word gives us English words like "cornet" and "cornucopia." Likewise, if we say that something is "bifurcated" or "furcated," it means that it divides into points (two or more than two), i.e., it is "forked." Much of the English language is rooted in Latin, and consequently, if we think about scientific names in terms of similar-sounding English words, we can often sort out their meaning and thereby discern some characteristic of the life form we are trying to identify. "Latifolia" describes a leaf with latitude, i.e., a broad leaf; "rotundifolia" refers to round leaves. That said, there is an annoying trend toward naming species after people these days, and had Calocera cornea been called "Calocera lewisia" for example, no such helpful clue would exist unless perhaps we knew that Mr. Lewis dyed his hair orange or furnished his office with oaken chairs.
Monday, February 27, 2017
Undeniable Evidence
Day 137: If this scene fails to inspire you to break out the seed catalogs, you're beyond all hope of redemption. Snow or no, the daffodils are solid evidence that Spring is on the way, and every year, their white-petalled, orange-cupped blossoms bring up a discussion of the differences between daffodils, narcissi and jonquils. Okay, let's lay the facts on the table.
To start with, all three terms fall under the scientific name of Narcissus. Colloquially (and therefore not strictly speaking "correctly"), "daffodil" refers to the larger-flowered varieties with long trumpets. Likewise, "narcissus" covers small-flowered species with short trumpets or cups. "Jonquil" refers to those plants which bear more than one flower per stem (again, colloquially). "So what about miniatures? And the ones with half-length trumpets?" you ask. "Narcissi," I reply, because I always default to the scientific name if there's any doubt when someone is asking me for an "official" determination. I'm not fond of common names. They are often shared among completely unrelated species, and can exhibit quite a variety of regional permutations (i.e., Texas "bluebonnets" are a lupine under a pseudonym). Still, no matter what you call them, they announce the arrival of Spring in full voice, a glad invocation against winter's thrall.
Labels:
common names,
daffodils,
gardening,
scientific names,
snow
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

